Look Who’s Being Violent! Wisconsin Unions! I Thought Libs Said it was the Tea Party that was Violent!

After learning the state Senate passed the collective bargaining portion of the budget repair bill without the 14 missing Democrats, the Capitol erupted Wednesday evening as protesters flooded the closed building against a court order.

The hearings where the Senate passed the bill lasted less than a half hour, prompting the building to officially close around 6:30 p.m. Protesters outside chanted in frustration, “Let us in.” 

After about an hour and a half, protesters stormed the building’s entrances, forcing themselves past police blockades.

Protesters who remained in the building past the hearing’s conclusion ran the risk of being arrested for disorderly conduct because of a March 3 court order that declared people could not occupy the Capitol after hours.

Read all here:  http://badgerherald.com/news/2011/03/09/protests_more_aggres.php

Now this is funny stuff, because THIS is what liberals accused the Tea Party of being like.  But, the Tea Party has never behaved like this.  Liberals make all kinds of lying accusations against conservatives.  But, when liberals don’t get their way, look who behaves violently.  It’s very hypocritical and very funny! Bravo for Wisconsin Republicans who stuck to their guns!

Advertisements

Hypocrisy Watch: Dem Capuano to Union Supporters, you have to “get a little bloody.”

Boy, is this typical of liberals in general.  “Hateful rhetoric” is only “hateful rhetoric” if it’s said by conservatives.  If a liberal says it, no matter how violent or hateful, it’s perfectly okay in the view of liberals.

This is the same Democrat who lectured us (back in January) about civility in politics.  But the minute he thinks his power base is threatened, look how he talks.  It’s extremely telling and extremely hypocritical.

Capuano is now back peddling on his comments.   http://www.breitbart.tv/dem-rep-to-union-supporters-you-have-to-get-a-little-bloody/  (Sorry, you will have to follow the url to see the video.  I can’t embed it. ) 

When are Democrats going to learn?  There is a new media now.  Just because you say something in front of a friendly audience, doesn’t mean it won’t get out to everyone else.  Hello Democrats!  Welcome to the age of Youtube!

Which means he didn’t think he was going to get called on this, but now that he has, he’s trying to squirm his way out. 

This is why we shouldn’t be intimidated by talk of civility.  It’s just an attempt by liberals to shut us up.  They have no intention of following through with their own civility.  They call the Tea Party nuts, and threaten to “get a little bloody?”  But we, in the Tea Party, we conservatives, we have to be careful about what we say?  You liberals are fooling no one.

Hypocrisy Watch

 

Barack Obama ‘You’re no Ronald Reagan’

Why is it Democrats are always looking contemptuously on conservatism, like the Tea Party, yet trying to emulate the Tea Party’s heroes, like Reagan, when they want to get elected?

Obama’s recent State of the Union speech was full of self-conscious optimism (though the slogan “winning the future” is a pygmy compared with Reagan’s “morning in America”) and appeals to bipartisanship – a nod to the celebrated fact that Reagan managed to work with Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill, a liberal Democrat.

Other Democrats, taking this a step further, are using Reagan as a stick to beat the modern Republican party, painting him as a moderate pragmatist who would be out of step with today’s hard-right ideologues.

Republicans treat all this with weary disdain. To paraphrase Senator Lloyd Bentsen’s famous 1988 put down of Senator Dan Quayle, the older ones are saying: “I knew Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan is an idol of mine. President Obama, you’re no Ronald Reagan.”

Rich Galen, a Republican strategist who was working on Capitol Hill in the Reagan era, says that conservatives giggle at Obama’s attempts to be Reaganesque. “Obama is diametrically opposed to everything Reagan stood for.”

There is little doubt that Reagan would have been dryly derisive of Obama’s policies and presidency. “Government is like a baby,” Reagan once quipped. “An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other.”

Obama, by contrast, views government as a kindly nurse and the people as the baby. According to his mindset, the people should submit to those in government who know better and whose role is to make decisions and control the purse strings.

Read all here:  http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100074903/american-way-republicans-to-barack-obama-you%e2%80%99re-no-ronald-reagan/

That Democrats are trying to revise the history of Reagan is laughable.  There are too many people of my generation who remember Reagan and know Obama is nothing like Reagan.  Democrats think they can recast Reagan for all those born after Reagan, who don’t remember him. 

Frankly, I think this will be a laughable fail on the Democrat’s part.  It would be like Republicans trying to recast FDR as a spend thrift conservative.  Despite there are generations who have been born after the time of FDR, there is too much known about FDR, for that to fly.  The same is true about Reagan. 

This move by the Democrats reveals a two-part desperation.

A)  That they know the Tea Party and conservatism trumped them in the 2010 elections.

B)  They think they only way to fight back is not with any honesty about their own ideas, but to lie about conservative ideas.  They think if they can get enough people to believe Reagan was really one of them, and not a conservative more like the Tea Party, they can fool people into voting for them.

Laughable at best, pathetic at the least.

%d bloggers like this: